Skip to content
Module 08 · The fundraising deck~22s dwell · weight 9

Business Model

Show how you make money and prove the unit economics hold up. Investors spend ~22 seconds here, one of the most scrutinized slides.

Include
  • Pricing (real numbers, not 'contact us')
  • Revenue streams, subscription, usage, transaction, hybrid
  • Unit economics: ACV, gross margin, LTV/CAC or a credible path to it
  • Key assumptions behind the numbers, called out plainly
Cut
  • Vague 'we'll monetize later'
  • A model too complex to explain in two lines
  • LTV/CAC without stating the payback period
Red flags a reader notices
  • No pricing at all
  • 'We'll figure out monetization later'
  • 80%+ gross margin claimed with no cost breakdown
Pitfalls behind them
  • Pricing is 'contact us' or 'usage-based, will figure out'.
  • Gross margin is stated but the cost of goods behind it is not.
  • LTV/CAC is a headline but the payback period is missing.
60-second self-test
  • · Can a partner underwrite your model in one glance: price, ACV, margin, payback?
  • · If a customer asked 'what will this cost me a year from now,' can you answer without a call?
Template
$[X]/mo per [seat / customer / API call]. ACV $[Y]. Gross margin [Z]%. Payback [N] months.
Weak

"SaaS pricing based on customer needs. We'll iterate."

Strong

"$39/contractor/mo, floor $975/mo per customer. ACV $11.7K. 74% gross margin (FX + banking rails dominant). CAC $4.1K, payback 5.2 months."

Everything a reader needs to underwrite the model in one line, matching the $11.7K ACV used on Nimbus's market slide.

Quick quiz

1. A seed-stage business model slide should…
  • State pricing and the core unit economics in one glance.
  • Defer monetization to later stages.

Even at seed, investors want a credible path to revenue.

2. Which unit-economics line is most credible?
  • 'SaaS with strong LTV/CAC.'
  • 'CAC $4.1K, payback 5.2 months, gross margin 74%.'

Numbers, units, and a payback period an investor can sanity-check.

Sources