Skip to content
Module 06 · The board deck~60s dwell · weight 9

Top 3 risks + mitigations

Name the three biggest risks to the business right now, each with a mitigation already underway, not a plan to make a plan.

This is the slide that earns a founder credibility; Suster argues boards trust founders who name risk plainly more than founders who present only good news.

Include
  • Exactly 3 risks, ranked by severity
  • A specific mitigation in progress for each, with an owner
  • Risks that are actually uncomfortable, not softballs
Cut
  • Risks with no mitigation attached
  • Generic macro risks ('the economy') that avoid naming a company-specific problem
Red flags a reader notices
  • The listed risks are all external and none are things the team controls
  • A known risk from last quarter's deck has vanished with no update
Pitfalls behind them
  • Listing 6+ risks so the real one gets diluted
  • Naming a risk with no owner assigned to the mitigation
60-second self-test
  • · Would a skeptical director agree these are the top 3 risks, or spot a bigger one missing?
  • · Does every risk from last quarter's deck get a status update, even if just 'resolved'?
Template
[Risk]: [why it matters]. Mitigation: [specific action], owner [name], by [date].
Weak

"Market conditions remain uncertain and there is always execution risk in a competitive space."

Strong

"Risk: 6-month runway (cash-out Aug 2026) with burn at $312K/mo against $280K budget. Mitigation: hiring freeze on 2 open roles starting Sept, CFO cutting burn to $270K/mo by Nov, owner: CEO."

Nimbus ties the risk directly to the runway number from the dashboard, with a dated fix and a named owner, not a vague promise to 'watch it closely.'

Quick quiz

1. What must accompany each of the three risks?
  • A severity color
  • A specific mitigation already in progress, with an owner
  • A comparison to a competitor
  • Nothing, naming it is enough

A risk without a mitigation is just an admission, not a plan.

2. Why cap this slide at exactly 3 risks?
  • Boards can't count higher
  • Forcing a ranked top 3 makes founders prioritize instead of listing everything vaguely risky
  • It's a template rule with no real reason
  • Legal requires a maximum of 3

A list of 8 risks reads as unprioritized; a ranked 3 reads as a founder in control of the picture.

Sources